Doctrine Patterns - Revision history

Peterl: /* A bias towards action */

2019-06-05T14:24:07Z

‎A bias towards action

2019-06-05T06:25:04Z

‎Strategy is iterative, not linear

2019-06-05T06:24:38Z

‎Strategy is iterative, not linear

2019-06-05T06:24:18Z

‎Strategy is iterative, not linear

2019-06-05T06:21:18Z

‎References

2019-06-05T06:16:13Z

‎Manage inertia

2019-06-05T06:15:33Z

‎Manage inertia

2019-06-05T06:14:02Z

‎Manage inertia

2019-06-05T06:11:55Z

‎Design for constant evolution

2019-06-05T06:10:07Z

‎Provide purpose, mastery & autonomy

@@ Line 156: / Line 156: @@
 ===A bias towards action===
 learn by playing the game
 {{Book|11}}

@@ Line 130: / Line 130: @@
 fast reactive cycles
-From Simon’s Book:
+From Simon’s blog:
   This is for anyone thinking of writing long winded strategy documents, target operating models and step by step plans of how the future will be. Immediately book an appointment with HR. You are a valuable asset for the company particularly if we can deploy you within a competitor. HR will help you find a strategy position in a competitor and you will be given glowing references especially about how sad we are to lose you. We might even try to put up a "fight" to encourage the competitor to think you're an attractive acquisition. We will even pay you to join them. Instead of long winded plans, we will have direction towards a position and adapt as needed. We will "cross the river by feeling the stones".<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>

@@ Line 130: / Line 130: @@
 fast reactive cycles
-From Simin’s Book:
+From Simon’s Book:
   This is for anyone thinking of writing long winded strategy documents, target operating models and step by step plans of how the future will be. Immediately book an appointment with HR. You are a valuable asset for the company particularly if we can deploy you within a competitor. HR will help you find a strategy position in a competitor and you will be given glowing references especially about how sad we are to lose you. We might even try to put up a "fight" to encourage the competitor to think you're an attractive acquisition. We will even pay you to join them. Instead of long winded plans, we will have direction towards a position and adapt as needed. We will "cross the river by feeling the stones".<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>

@@ Line 129: / Line 129: @@
 ===Strategy is iterative, not linear===
 fast reactive cycles
 {{Book|11}}

@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
 From Simon’s blog:
-  We all have it. It's caused by past success. You will realise that you have it. There are about [[sixteen different forms|Inertia patterns]] and you will learn how to recognise this. When you find yourself saying "but this is how we do it" or "but this has always worked in the past" or "don't fiddle with the machine as it ain't broke" then you will question why you are saying this. If someone is challenging what is being done then you will LISTEN and you will ask why you are responding in such a way.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>
+  We all have it. It's caused by past success. You will realise that you have it. There are about [[Inertia patterns|sixteen different forms]] and you will learn how to recognise this. When you find yourself saying "but this is how we do it" or "but this has always worked in the past" or "don't fiddle with the machine as it ain't broke" then you will question why you are saying this. If someone is challenging what is being done then you will LISTEN and you will ask why you are responding in such a way.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>
 {{Book|11}}

@@ Line 174: / Line 174: @@
 ===Manage inertia===
 e.g. existing practice, political capital, previous investment
 From Simon’s blog:
-  We all have it. It's caused by past success. You will realise that you have it. There are about sixteen different forms and you will learn how to recognise this. When you find yourself saying "but this is how we do it" or "but this has always worked in the past" or "don't fiddle with the machine as it ain't broke" then you will question why you are saying this. If someone is challenging what is being done then you will LISTEN and you will ask why you are responding in such a way.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>
+  We all have it. It's caused by past success. You will realise that you have it. There are about [[sixteen different forms|Inertia patterns]] and you will learn how to recognise this. When you find yourself saying "but this is how we do it" or "but this has always worked in the past" or "don't fiddle with the machine as it ain't broke" then you will question why you are saying this. If someone is challenging what is being done then you will LISTEN and you will ask why you are responding in such a way.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>
 {{Book|11}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 5 June 2019
Line 176:		Line 176:

	[[Inertia patterns]]		[[Inertia patterns]]
		+
		+	From Simon’s blog:
		+	We all have it. It's caused by past success. You will realise that you have it. There are about sixteen different forms and you will learn how to recognise this. When you find yourself saying "but this is how we do it" or "but this has always worked in the past" or "don't fiddle with the machine as it ain't broke" then you will question why you are saying this. If someone is challenging what is being done then you will LISTEN and you will ask why you are responding in such a way.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>

	{{Book\|11}}		{{Book\|11}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:11, 5 June 2019
Line 315:		Line 315:

	===Design for constant evolution===		===Design for constant evolution===
		+
		+	From Simon’s blog:
		+	Whilst a team might become a semi permanent structure, the work it undertakes will evolve. It is therefore a duty to ensure that work evolves through the organisation e.g. a pioneering team discovers an uncharted space, a team of settlers take the work and productise it hence forcing the pioneers to move on. A team of town planners then industrialise the product when appropriate forcing the settlers to move on.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>

	{{Book\|11}}		{{Book\|11}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 5 June 2019
Line 222:		Line 222:

	===Provide purpose, mastery & autonomy===		===Provide purpose, mastery & autonomy===
		+
		+	From Simon’s blog:
		+	Each team shall be autonomous within the confines of what it is supposed to do (described by a fitness function). Each team will therefore own what it does. Each team shall be able to see how they fit into the whole (hence maps) and develop mastery in both aptitude and attitude.<ref>https://blog.gardeviance.org/2016/05/wardleys-doctrine.html</ref>

	{{Book\|11}}		{{Book\|11}}