Difference between revisions of "Mapping Outcomes"
From WardleyPedia
(Created page with "This is a list of benefits or outcomes that Wardley Mapping technique can help achieve. ==Anticipation== ==Remove Duplication== ==Communication== ==Identify Opportunities==") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a list of benefits or outcomes that Wardley Mapping technique can help achieve. | This is a list of benefits or outcomes that Wardley Mapping technique can help achieve. | ||
| − | == | + | ==General Benefit== |
| + | Wardley maps can help you be methodical in thinking about your [[Purpose]], the [[Landscape]], [[Climate]], [[Doctrine]], and your [[Leadership]] activities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Answer Common Questions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===“Does this strategy make sense?”=== | ||
| + | To be honest, I hadn’t a clue whether it did or not. I had no idea what a real strategy was, let alone any concept of how to evaluate the document. I leafed through the pages, it all seemed to make sense, the diagrams looked good and I didn’t know what I was looking for anyway. So I responded “seems fine to me”. However, the reason why I had chosen those words was more to do with the strategy looking familiar than anything else. I had seen the same words used in other documents, some of the same diagrams in other presentations and I had been to a conference where an industry thought leader had told me about the stuff that mattered. That stuff — “innovation”, “efficiency”, “alignment” and “culture” — had all been highlighted in the strategy document.{{Book cite 1}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Anticipate the Future== | ||
==Remove Duplication== | ==Remove Duplication== | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 6 May 2019
This is a list of benefits or outcomes that Wardley Mapping technique can help achieve.
Contents
General Benefit
Wardley maps can help you be methodical in thinking about your Purpose, the Landscape, Climate, Doctrine, and your Leadership activities.
Answer Common Questions
“Does this strategy make sense?”
To be honest, I hadn’t a clue whether it did or not. I had no idea what a real strategy was, let alone any concept of how to evaluate the document. I leafed through the pages, it all seemed to make sense, the diagrams looked good and I didn’t know what I was looking for anyway. So I responded “seems fine to me”. However, the reason why I had chosen those words was more to do with the strategy looking familiar than anything else. I had seen the same words used in other documents, some of the same diagrams in other presentations and I had been to a conference where an industry thought leader had told me about the stuff that mattered. That stuff — “innovation”, “efficiency”, “alignment” and “culture” — had all been highlighted in the strategy document.[1]
